It’s clear sufficient why Netflix would need to return to the nightmarish world of the South Korean “Squid Game,” with its life-or-death choices, betrayals and humiliations amongst contestants determined for the fortune supplied the winner. In spite of everything, the sequence is the streamer’s greatest hit to this point and has received three Display Actors Guild Awards and 6 Emmys (together with for drama sequence, lead actor for Lee Jung-jae and directing for creator Hwang Dong-hyuk).
However why would Hwang need to come again for extra, and the way might he justify placing Lee’s character, Gi-hun, again in that sort of jeopardy?
Seems Hwang has a lot extra to say about humanity via “Squid Game,” sufficient even for 2 extra seasons (Season 2 drops on Dec. 26, and the group is engaged on Season 3 now). And in doing so, he’s made one necessary tweak — one which modified the central query of the present.
As to his protagonist: “At the end of Season 1, Gi-hun was already a different person,” says Hwang, via an interpreter, of what might drag this everyman again to that candy-colored hell. “After he came out of the game as a winner, he discovered his mom dead, and he dyed his hair. Even if he tries to go back to his normal life, the damage is already done. He cannot go back [to that life] because of the trauma.”
Lee Jung-jae, heart, as Gi-hun in Season 2 of “Squid Game.”
(No Ju-han/Netflix)
Season 2’s Gi-hun just isn’t the hapless loser viewers first encountered. It’s three years later, and he has devoted his now-considerable fortune to discovering the mysterious island on which he watched so many individuals die for the amusement of the video games’ patrons. He’s on a mission to finish the video games as soon as and for all. However his trauma runs deep, as encapsulated by a surprising scene by which he tries to leverage info out of somebody — by taking part in Russian roulette with them.
“They’re playing this game in a confined space with only two of them, and it’s literally a death game,” says Lee, additionally via an interpreter, of the lingering results of the video games on Gi-hun. “There had to have been some type of explosive adrenaline rush. And I thought to myself, maybe Gi-hun, without even realizing it, is enjoying that rush. When I thought about the motivation behind it as an actor, I was also doubting myself. This scene is very cinematic, it’s very dramatic,” he says.
Hwang acknowledges it was impressed by “The Deer Hunter.” “So I had to think, ‘How do we bring that to the ground? How do we make it realistic?’ There are those two elements: [He’s obsessed with] finding those who are behind the game and putting a stop to it; and on the other hand, he’s inadvertently enjoying himself.”
However the principle distinction between the 2 seasons stems from the present’s investigation into human nature. In Season 1, contestants got one alternative to vote — to proceed to strive for the large cash, or stop and go dwelling with nothing however their lives. These searching for to finish the competitors received … however most proved determined sufficient to return anyway. In Season 2, that vote happens after every recreation, and if the bulk chooses to stop, the survivors cut up the pot — everybody will get just a little richer and goes dwelling alive.
However what occurs if the bulk decides it could slightly attempt to get so much richer, even when that signifies that most of these round them must die, together with those that needed to go away? The human query strikes from being about survival — what would you quit of your self to dwell? — to greed — are you prepared to let others die on your probability at fabulous wealth?
And there’s a sociopolitical query too. It’s a binary system; a alternative of extremes. And that’s precisely what Hwang needed to deal with, beneath the twisted trappings of the world’s hottest thriller sequence.
“I tried to cast this question of, ‘What is the meaning of this voting system and this rule of the majority? Is the rule of the majority always correct?’” says director Hwang Dong-hyuk.
(Shayan Asgharnia/For The Occasions)
Hwang says, “In Season 2, I look to fully leverage the voting system. There are many issues regarding presidential elections, in Korea and the United States and across the world. [Factions] try to dominate through the rule of majority. And in Season 2 and Season 3 throughout, I tried to cast this question of, ‘What is the meaning of this voting system and this rule of the majority? Is the rule of the majority always correct?’ Looking at the political and social landscape across the globe, I thought that casting this question at this time would be very meaningful. Across the globe, economic and political polarization and extremism are rampant these days. So that was something that I wanted to deal with.”
Lee says, “Director Hwang has said if you look at how the votes go in the show, it’s almost always that the scale is tipped by one more vote or one more person. It’s nearly 50-50. Then one vote will make one side the winning side,” which strikes at Hwang’s query of majority rule when the alternatives are so polarized and the stakes so excessive.
“While that does reflect reality, as a performer, I was really focused more on human greed and desire,” Lee provides. “In the beginning, people think, ‘Oh, I’m good with this. I can leave the game with just this amount of money.’ But if you play one more round, you find yourself richer, and it’s very natural to think, ‘How about just one more?’ ”