Decentralized finance (DeFi) lending platform Compound is dealing with calls to onboard further threat managers in response to a just lately authorized governance proposal made by present supervisor Gauntlet.
Throwing its hat into the ring as a possible candidate, Chainrisk is looking for extra transparency amongst COMP delegates and their negotiations, with a reply even pointing to an unlabeled handle that could be linked to Gauntlet.
In what DeFi commentator Togbe is looking “some of the griftiest stuff I’ve ever seen from Gauntlet,” Gauntlet’s proposal is for Compound to make use of competitor Morpho (for which Gauntlet can be a service supplier) to launch new markets on the Polygon community.
Gauntlet, nevertheless, presents the transfer as a win-win-win for Compound, Morpho, and Polygon, a solution to capitalize on a possible hole available in the market following a cooling off of relations between Polygon and Aave, DeFi’s greatest lending platform.
Aave, which represents over a 3rd of Polygon’s whole worth locked (TVL), based on DeFiLlama, threatened to go away the community in response to a controversial proposal to make use of bridge funds for yield farming, additionally through Morpho.
Aave governance delegate Marc Zeller took to X to spotlight the perceived battle of curiosity within the proposal, characterizing the proposal as “subsidiz[ing] a competitor’s growth that’s been eroding their market share every quarter.”
He additionally supplied to wager $50,000 on whether or not the transfer would show to be a profitable consequence for COMP holders.
Nevertheless, Gauntlet has defended the proposal, citing points resembling “ongoing lawsuits, Labs hands tied, market share eroding” as causes for such a transfer, in addition to stressing the proposal will not be self-serving in highlighting the charge construction, and the truth that Gauntlet’s Morpho earnings are already capped.
Whereas Gauntlet’s proposal states that “Compound DAO will be the sole owner of the vaults and will accrue all revenue generated during the joint incentives trial program,” it provides that, in future, and topic to DAO approval, “Gauntlet may introduce a fee-splitter contract as revenue share for the work Gauntlet performs as the vaults’ Curator.”
Gauntlet’s Vice President of Development, Nick Cannon, has hit again at criticism on X, which he calls “approved comms” from a “worried” Aave camp, additionally claiming that Gauntlet was censored throughout its time at Aave.
Polygon Labs’ CEO additionally claims that Aave pressured groups throughout governance votes.
This isn’t the primary time that Gauntlet, Aave, and Morpho have come into battle. Apart from the current “Polygon(e)” controversy, tensions flared final 12 months when Gauntlet walked away from its position at Aave and commenced working with Morpho.
Shortly after, the protocols argued over their respective approaches to threat when customers had been liquidated throughout a depeg of Renzo’s ezETH.
Whereas the spat might appear to be nothing greater than two units of former colleagues bickering on the timeline, sustaining wholesome and purposeful DAO governance processes is a critical enterprise.
A number of precedents have been set by a scarcity of consideration to DAO voting, such because the $25 million governance “attack” suffered by Compound final July. Beforehand, in 2022, Compound’s $830 million ether (ETH) market was bricked for per week when a proposal had unintended penalties.
Elsewhere, Maker DAO made emergency adjustments to borrowing restrictions in response to rumors of a takeover plot simply final month.
DeFi doom and gloom
The newest crypto sell-off continues to pile on the strain in DeFi; the sector has seen TVL plunge by over a 3rd, down from its current peak of $138 billion on December 17 to simply underneath $88 billion at the moment.
Even these pulling the strings had been omitted of pocket, because the Donald Trump-backed World Liberty Monetary is reportedly down unhealthy, cursing ETH similar to everybody else.
As monetary markets took a nosedive yesterday, the broader crypto ecosystem racked up nearly $900 million value of liquidations, based on knowledge from Coinglass.
In the meantime, over in DeFi, customers monitored one whale’s dicey 65,000 ETH ($123 million) place with bated breath, fearing its liquidation may trigger an on-chain cascade.