Nature and its parts are key to “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes.” The fourth installment within the fashionable reboot of the traditional 1968 movie leaves the occasions of 2017’s “War for the Planet of the Apes” far, far behind. The dystopian world it depicts is all however devoid of people now.
For director Wes Ball (“The Maze Runner”), this journey movie set in lush jungles and harsh seashores was an opportunity to think about a contemporary tackle this long-running franchise.
“Obviously, we had awesome, massive shoes to fill from the previous trilogy,” Ball tells The Envelope. “But where we started was asking, ‘How do we differentiate ourselves from those movies while at the same time, story-wise, conceptually, visually tie into them?’”
Even earlier than the manufacturing crew landed on taking pictures on location in Australia, Ball’s first intuition was to get out of the dreary, overcast Vancouver landscapes from these earlier movies.
“This is a story about a new day,” Ball remembers pondering. “Let’s get into some sunlight.”
And so, with Caesar (performed within the earlier movies by Andy Serkis) now useless, “Kingdom” thrusts us a number of generations into the longer term. There we meet Noa (Owen Teague), a wide-eyed younger ape whose fearless climbing whereas scavenging for an eagle egg permits audiences to witness a cityscape ravaged by nature and time. All in an 11-minute sequence that’s absolutely computer-generated, give or take a shot or two.
“From a storytelling standpoint, one of the things that really drew me to the project was the opportunities for the world-building side of things in this bright, sunny landscape,” says Erik Winquist, the movie’s visible results director (an Oscar nominee for 2014’s “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes”). “We’ve fast-forwarded a couple hundred years. There isn’t a place we can go and shoot that’s going to give us everything we need.”
This meant that Wētā FX‘s cutting-edge technology (including its advanced motion-capture tools) would once more be leveraged to create fully fleshed-out ape performances, all while delivering several high-octane action set pieces that punctuate Noa’s quest. As Noa searches for his tribe after a violent assault on his village within the title of an ape referred to as Proximus Caesar (Kevin Durand), the movie’s visuals — in harsh daylight and shot in widescreen anamorphic — hark to the franchise’s roots.
“It all lends itself to this idea that we were a movie that was straddling both the previous trilogy that we came from and the 1968 Charlton Heston movie that started everything,” Ball says. “If you look at the movie, you can see this interesting thing where it kind of feels like both movies.”
The aim all through was to make use of visible results in service of telling a narrative about needing to pummel one’s manner by means of grief to search out the energy to hold on.
“We tried very hard to make sure that we felt very authentic and real,” Ball provides. “We didn’t want it to feel over-polished. We wanted it to feel spontaneous. That’s what I’d done in ‘The Maze Runner’ movies, where you feel like we’re sort of making it up on the spot. The camerawork is very dynamic and kind of active.”
Attaining that look of spontaneity required meticulous planning. That’s nowhere clearer than within the climactic last confrontation between Noa and Proximus Caesar’s brute in command, an imposing gorilla named Sylva (Eka Darville), which takes place inside a gargantuan armory that’s flooding shortly round them.
1
2
3
4
1. “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” FX WETNESS 2. “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” FX WATER SURFACE 3. “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” FX WATER FLOW 4. “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” – FX BUBBLES (twentieth Century Studios)
The completed scene.
(twentieth Century Studios)
“The tricky thing with that flood sequence in particular was the way that it had to dance with the camera,” Winquist notes. “Because one of [Ball’s] amazing strengths is in camera, and blocking, and working this stuff through in a way where the cut just flows beautifully from shot to shot.”
What helped was letting go of the thought of truly taking pictures the scene on location, or on a constructed set, or in water tanks. As a substitute, Teague and Darville have been tasked with operating by means of a jungle gym-like course (with 20-pound sandbags on their ft to imitate the burden of operating water) as they acted out the conflict between Noa and Sylva. Each ounce of water onscreen throughout that chase was simulated.
Winquist, who had simply labored on “Avatar: The Way of Water,” knew this is able to be a distinct type of problem. “The work that was done there was this pristine coral reef, a lot of underwater stuff that was crystal clear. Here we’re almost always above the surface. And it was really about the terrifying, turbulent, grungy, scummy rapids we were having to deal with here.”
Within the completed sequence, there’s a fluidity to watching Noa swing and climb, duck and swim as he fends off Sylva’s assaults.
“The thing with these films is that — and this is the terrible truth of it all — if we do our jobs correctly, people will stop thinking, ‘Oh, man, these visual effects are great,’” Winquist says.
What thrills him most is listening to how many individuals come out of the movie acknowledging simply how moved they don’t seem to be by the consequences or the actors themselves however by the sum of their elements. “You just sat through 1,500 shots of character performance that you were completely engrossed in,” Winquist says. “I’ve heard so many variations of comments like, ‘I can’t believe I’m feeling something for these apes.’”
“Yeah, it’s definitely a miracle that even works,” Ball provides.