President Joe Biden’s farewell to elected workplace on Jan. 20, 2025, presents a possibility to replicate on the legacy he left on the federal courts.
Many will understand Biden’s affect on the courts based totally on his appointment of Ketanji Brown Jackson, the nation’s first Black, feminine Supreme Court docket justice.
However Biden’s judicial legacy spans a long time and reaches far past the make-up of the present Supreme Court docket.
As a number one scholar of the federal courts, I imagine Biden’s judicial impression is most notable in three regards: his position within the 1991 affirmation of Clarence Thomas, his historic efforts throughout his presidency to diversify the federal bench, and his 2024 choice to veto laws increasing the variety of federal district courtroom judgeships.
Biden appointed extra girls to the federal bench than every other president, together with Ketanji Brown Jackson, proven right here with Biden on April 8, 2022, after the Senate confirmed her appointment as the primary Black girl to sit down on the U.S. Supreme Court docket.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Photographs
Chairman Biden’s impression
When he was a senator, Biden served because the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee from 1987 to 1995. Throughout that point, Biden oversaw the Senate’s consideration of lots of of federal courtroom appointments, together with six Supreme Court docket nominees.
His position within the 1991 affirmation listening to of Supreme Court docket Justice Clarence Thomas stands out for the way he dealt with allegations of sexual harassment introduced towards the nominee.
Thomas was appointed by President George H.W. Bush to interchange Thurgood Marshall, a liberal icon and the nation’s first Black Supreme Court docket justice.
Changing the liberal Marshall with the conservative Thomas had the potential to shift the ideological make-up of the courtroom. Consequently, Thomas’ affirmation listening to was certain to be contentious.
However issues obtained particularly heated when Anita Hill, a former colleague of Thomas, alleged that Thomas had sexually harassed her after they each labored on the Division of Schooling and on the Equal Employment Alternative Fee.
As chairman of the committee, it was finally as much as Biden how one can deal with the investigation of those allegations.
Maybe Biden’s most controversial choice concerned his refusal to permit senators to listen to from witnesses who have been keen to testify underneath oath to corroborate Hill’s allegations. In a 2017 interview, Biden stated that the witnesses backed out on the final minute. However this rationalization is contested by at the very least one witness, who stated she was by no means known as to testify.
Although we’ll by no means ensure, this testimony may have sunk Thomas’ affirmation. As a substitute, he was confirmed by a 52-48 Senate vote.
A lot later, Biden acknowledged that his dealing with of Hill’s allegations was going to be a problem in his 2020 presidential marketing campaign. Consequently, Biden reached out to Hill earlier than asserting his candidacy. In that cellphone name, he expressed his remorse for what she skilled on the listening to, however he didn’t go as far as to apologize.
Biden’s federal courtroom appointments
As president, Biden’s main legacy entails his historic efforts to diversify the federal bench when it comes to the race, gender, sexual orientation and faith of his judicial nominees.
Biden appointed extra girls to the bench than any president earlier than him, in addition to essentially the most racially and ethnically various group of judges within the nation’s historical past. Biden additionally appointed an unusually massive variety of former public defenders to judgeships.
Jackson, as a Black girl and former public defender, is essentially the most high- profile instance of this. However Biden additionally nominated greater than 1 / 4 of all sitting federal judges in his 4 years a president.
Biden’s efforts to diversify the federal bench are necessary and are prone to be tangible.
Having various judges on the courts will increase assist for courts amongst girls and other people of coloration. That is vital, since courts depend on the general public for his or her legitimacy, and America has turn out to be more and more various over time.
Feminine judges and judges of coloration are typically extra progressive of their decision-making than different judges, extra typically supporting litigants claiming violations of their civil rights. That is very true for areas during which such judges could have distinctive views and experiences, corresponding to gender and racial discrimination.
Equally, analysis reveals that judges who have been as soon as public defenders are much less prone to incarcerate convicted criminals and have a tendency handy down shorter sentences amongst these sentenced to jail.
The way forward for federal courts
Biden vetoed a invoice so as to add dozens of latest federal judges to the bench, apparently fearful that Donald Trump would get to nominate them.
One in all Biden’s lesser recognized, however very substantial, ultimate acts in workplace entails vetoing the JUDGES Act of 2024.
This laws would have added 66 judges to the federal courts. A few of these courts are presently understaffed, leading to heavy workloads for judges, creating delays within the administration of justice.
Although the invoice had unanimous assist within the Democratically managed Senate in August 2024, the Republican-led Home refused to vote on the invoice till after the 2024 election.
This was a strategic transfer that might be sure that the winner of the election – Donald Trump – would appoint the preliminary batch of 25 judges underneath the laws.
Biden stated that he vetoed the laws as a result of there have been some lingering questions that ought to be answered, corresponding to how the brand new judgeships can be allotted to courts throughout the nation.
However as a scholar of the federal courts, it’s evident to me that Biden’s actual motivation was to stop Trump from appointing the primary 25 judges.
Taken as an entire, Biden leaves an advanced legacy on the federal courts. On the one hand, he undertook unprecedented efforts to make sure that the federal courts seem like the folks they characterize. He additionally resisted efforts that might have moved the courts in a conservative route underneath Trump’s second time period.
However, Biden performed a serious position within the affirmation of Thomas, one of the conservative justices in American historical past.