Summary
This essay examines the enduring relevance of Henry Hazlitt’s Economics in One Lesson in analyzing up to date financial and social points. It first applies Hazlitt’s lesson to a few outstanding up to date points: protectionism, technophobia, and the financial fallacies surrounding struggle. The essay then shifts focus to the Danish welfare state (velfærdsstat), usually celebrated as a paragon of the Nordic mannequin of social democracy. By making use of Hazlitt’s lesson, the evaluation highlights each the seen achievements of Denmark’s social insurance policies and the unseen penalties. This reveals how authorities insurance policies can, generally inadvertently, prioritize short-term beneficial properties over sustainable outcomes. As well as, Hazlitt’s lesson is employed to critique the broader implications of state interventions in areas akin to public well being and agriculture, together with misguided dietary tips and insurance policies that drawback small-scale farmers. Investigating the ripple results of such interventions underscores the significance of recognizing the unseen, counterfactual outcomes that stay hidden in mainstream financial analyses. The essay concludes by reaffirming the timelessness of Hazlitt’s one lesson and advocating for a discount in authorities intervention as a simpler strategy to addressing financial and social challenges.
Introduction
Regardless of being practically an octogenarian print, Henry Hazlitt’s Economics in One Lesson stays pertinent to any evaluation of the present financial points that face us. As Hans-Hermann Hoppe writes, if a theoretical proposition’s validity doesn’t rely upon historic expertise, it may be established a priori, i.e. “once and for all by means of the intellectual apprehension or comprehension of the nature of things.” Not like the pure sciences, the place a falsification course of can steadily construct up information via empirical experiments, theories within the social sciences don’t essentially require fixed updates, and analyzing historic thinkers is as necessary as learning up to date social scientists (whose fashions could depend on underlying false assumptions). As Murray Rothbard writes, “In praxeology, in the analysis of human action, the axioms themselves are known to be true and meaningful.” It ought to thus not shock up to date and future readers that Hazlitt’s poignant evaluation will stay sharp throughout historic experiences.
This essay will first introduce Hazlitt’s one lesson, offering numerous examples that reveal its mental persistence, after which proceed to delve deeper into the up to date case of the Danish welfare state (velfærdsstat).
The Lesson
Not like many trendy writers, Hazlitt avoids obscurantism and will get straight to the purpose, stating his one lesson within the early pages of the guide: “The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups.”
His predominant affect is Frédéric Bastiat’s 1850 Ce qu’on voit et ce qu’on ne voit pas (“that which is seen and that which is not seen”), by which Bastiat argues that many financial actions have speedy, seen results (the seen), however additionally they have oblique, neglected penalties (the unseen). Bastiat highlights the thought of alternative price, the worth of what might have been accomplished with assets in the event that they weren’t directed towards the seen motion; this serves to remind the reader that authorities expenditures are usually not costless.
One other software is Hazlitt’s critique of technophobes, whose luddite convictions make them oppose improvements out of short-term concern that the brand new applied sciences will disrupt the financial established order. Nonetheless, in response to Joseph Schumpeter, that is one thing to be admired and, Hazlitt explains, via examples akin to English stocking knitters, momentary short-term disruption could cause exponentially higher financial outcomes for the affected staff. The current astonishing developments in synthetic intelligence (AI) applied sciences and its daybreak upon many fields of labor are related to this dialogue. Whereas it appears sure that the social dangers of AI must be taken significantly, it can’t be denied that those that criticize AI from an financial standpoint are as soon as once more falling into the technophobe entice that Hazlitt exalted. Moreover, Hazlitt explains how “make-work rules” stem from technophobic sentiments; with the appearance of AI, we might even see such guidelines emulate Hazlitt’s examples such because the painters’ union that imposed restrictions on using spray weapons to make work by requiring the slower strategy of making use of paint with a brush. Future laws could require using handbook computational work to “produce employment” that AI might have effortlessly accomplished.
A 3rd, extra common, instance of Hazlitt’s one lesson utilized to at this time’s world is his evaluation of the detrimental results of struggle. He exposes an financial fallacy that’s nonetheless prevalent at this time, particularly, that struggle boosts the economic system. Other than the wicked anti-peace incentives that such notions allude to, they depend on deceptive financial metrics. For instance, the generally used Gross Nationwide Product (GNP), per Rothbard, must be changed with the Non-public Product Remaining (PPR), a modified GNP that subtracts authorities spending to disclose a extra correct evaluation of a nation’s economic system. Hazlitt explains how most of the corollary conclusions from this financial falsehood, akin to the concept that international locations whose manufacturing crops have been destroyed within the struggle had a postwar benefit over the Individuals because of decrease substitute prices, fall sufferer to pondering “in terms of an abstraction.” Hazlitt claims that such pondering is ubiquitous in most financial fallacies, and results in the prioritization of “the collectivity, the ‘nation’ – and to forget or ignore the individuals who make it up and give it meaning.” And, subsequently, “No one could think that the destruction of war was an economic advantage who began by thinking first of all of the people whose property was destroyed.” Furthermore, struggle is a primary instance of Bastiat’s damaged window thought experiment, which Hazlitt begins his guide with. Contemplating the varied ongoing geopolitical conflicts, the 2 most outstanding being the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict and the Conflict on Gaza, Hazlitt’s phrases appear to have fallen on deaf ears.
As evident, Hazlitt’s one lesson has huge purposes. This essay now delves into its deployment on the Danish welfare state.
Velfærdsstat: The Danish Welfare State
Denmark’s welfare state is hailed because the poster youngster for the so-called Nordic mannequin, characterised by the expansive social insurance policies and a sturdy welfare system current within the Scandinavian international locations. Keynesian economist Joseph Stiglitz has praised it for remodeling Scandinavia right into a “land of opportunity that America once was.” Proponents attribute its success to its market-based blended economic system. To an Austrian economist, this description of the Nordic mannequin raises issues on account of the truth that such “middle-of-the-road” financial programs are considered as unsustainable, and, as Mises warned, they need to be considered as “the realization of socialism by installments.”
Allan Carlson has explored how the social order, specializing in kids and the household, is impacted by such a “middle way” strategy in Sweden, Denmark’s neighboring Nordic mannequin nation. Envisioned and carried out largely by the Scandinavian democratic-socialist events, the Nordic mannequin of welfarism has been memorably portrayed in rose-colored glasses by American progressives akin to Bernie Sanders, whose enthusiasm for it was focal throughout his 2020 presidential marketing campaign. They advocate for stronger and extra structured state intervention in social advantages, pointing to the Danish authorities’s achievements, starting from instructional grants to paid parental go away, and, probably the most regularly voiced, healthcare.
In response to its international ministry, Denmark “is known for its strong welfare state system, and for being one of the most egalitarian societies in the world.” Supporters of the Nordic mannequin, akin to Jeffrey Sachs, level to Denmark’s success in attaining a excessive stage of equality as a profit. Nonetheless, they’re partaking in what Rothbard identifies because the “unquestioned ethical value of ‘equality.’” Rothbard highlights that in “the area of egalitarianism, they [economists] have been able to make a flat value judgment on behalf of equality with remarkable impunity.” Understanding that it isn’t a provided that equality must be the financial goal of society diminishes the virtues of Danish welfarism.
The Seen
At first look, Denmark’s welfarism seems to have achieved spectacular financial outcomes; as Per Henrik Larsen highlights, Denmark’s economic system has steadily risen above different European international locations. On the social entrance, Denmark continues to rank within the higher echelon of nations per indicators akin to equality, life satisfaction, security, and many others. Staying true to its characterization as a Nordic mannequin economic system, the Danish authorities roughly spent the equal of 45 billion USD in 2023, with a distribution visualized within the chart under (Determine 1).
Determine 1: Authorities expenditure (2023). Supply: Statistics Denmark.
These authorities expenditures produce seen outcomes, with polls exhibiting how most Danes are completely happy to pay taxes, seeing them as a useful funding. This shouldn’t be too stunning when contemplating the advantages that Danes have at their disposal, with the primary ones being: pensions, well being care, parental go away, instructional grants, integration and refugee help, and advantages for: kids, housing, incapacity, aged, and sick go away. For instance the magnitude of Danish welfarism, allow us to examine the advantages a pupil in Denmark could obtain. The tutorial grant offers college students residing away from residence with roughly 1000 USD per 30 days (about half when the coed nonetheless lives at residence), on prime of that, lease help (normally round 15% of the lease) could be supplied in response to circumstances. It turns into clear why American progressives, burdened with pupil debt, could idealize Denmark, the place training shouldn’t be solely free however the college students are given a considerable earnings.
These shortcomings are usually not widespread in public discourse and exemplify as soon as extra how Hazlitt’s one lesson of exploring the larger image of financial insurance policies is being sidelined for faster and shallower interpretations of Danish welfarism.
Just like the government-funded bridge that Hazlitt describes, which is difficult to not discover, the advantages from Danish welfarism are conspicuous. However, abiding by Hazlitt’s one lesson, we should keep in mind that, “What has happened is merely that one thing has been created instead of others.” This brings us to the unseen penalties of the Danish welfare state.
The Unseen
Hazlitt’s one lesson emulates the favored alternative price adage that there ain’t no such factor as a free lunch. Whereas foreign money expansionists could declare in any other case, Hazlitt emphasizes that actual wealth isn’t created by cash printing, and funding for Danish social advantages finally comes from productive members of society. Leaving apart the truth that this strategy of coercive redistribution (whether or not from direct taxation or oblique taxation via the growth of the cash provide) is what funds the federal government’s catastrophic actions akin to struggle, these insurance policies have unseen results. In a hypothetical situation the place Danes might maintain extra of their earnings, as a substitute of working for the federal government half of their time, one can solely think about the improvements and investments which may come up. Might college students and fogeys who at the moment make use of state advantages be higher off in such a world?
Understanding the idea of the unseens, the truth that there are misplaced potentials that we’ll by no means expertise nor apprehend their forever-unrealized qualities, can also be related to public well being. Since Hazlitt’s lesson teaches us that the artwork of economics investigates the “effects of any act or policy,” it is very important discover all the results of acts of presidency that promote sure well being packages. From weight-reduction plan recommendation to vaccine suggestions, the Danish authorities is impacting the well being of its residents. An in-depth evaluation of the organic deserves of those governmental suggestions shouldn’t be the main focus of this essay, however no matter their penalties are, the upshot is that there exists an unseen potential for public well being; we are going to by no means understand how a lot more healthy, or unhealthier, the Danish public could be had the federal government not intervened.
Transferring on from these unseens that can, by definition, by no means be seen, sure results are unseen to the plenty however observed by the followers of Hazlitt’s lesson who have a look at the longer and broader impacts of a coverage. For instance, as a rising variety of individuals are realizing, public well being is in shambles. Most likely not as worrying as American public well being, Danish public well being statistics nonetheless reveal alarming developments. As aforementioned, numerous indicators don’t present the advantageous outcomes that proponents could anticipate from free healthcare. Weight problems, a key indicator of total metabolic operate, and thus well being, has seen daunting progress. Psychological well being, particularly among the many youth, is simply as alarming. Denmark ranks as one of many prime international locations with probably the most antidepressant customers, with virtually one in ten Danes being prescribed antidepressants; the variety of younger Danes recognized with anxiousness has tripled within the final decade. General, 15% of kids and adolescents in Denmark have been recognized with a psychological dysfunction. Moreover, Danish youngsters devour twice the European common of month-to-month alcohol and have additionally skilled an increase in leisure opioid medication. As well as, different power well being points which are plaguing the world, akin to neurodegenerations, are witnessing rising charges in Denmark. While there isn’t any causal hyperlink between state welfarism and these worrying well being statistics (as we see related developments throughout various ranges of state welfarism in numerous nations), it may be excluded that welfarism is succeeding at stopping their rise.
With free healthcare being a central side of Danish welfarism, it is very important discover a few of their federal well being suggestions. The final pattern is pushing for plant-based diets. The Danish Official Dietary Pointers are largely similar to the Dietary Pointers for Individuals, advising a plant-based weight-reduction plan stuffed with entire grains, lean protein, vegetable oils, fruits, and greens, and low in alcohol, saturated fat, added sugar, and sodium. Consultants who’ve investigated the long-term results of those insurance policies, throughout all teams of individuals as Hazlitt teaches us, have discovered nightmarish outcomes; accepting their analyses as true, these misguided dietary insurance policies, and their consequential suboptimal pharmaceutical suggestions, have led to a destruction of human life that dwarfs that of the world’s worst historic genocides.
Along with dietary tips, the Danish authorities has influenced its residents’ diets through the downstream results of their agricultural insurance policies. A tax on carbon dioxide livestock emissions shall be launched in 2030. A Hazlittian evaluation reveals that such a tax will disproportionately hurt small-scale farmers, who’ve much less monetary flexibility to soak up the associated fee. Furthermore, this tax fails to distinguish between kinds of cattle farming, additional harming small-scale, regenerative cattle farmers. The challenges confronted by small-scale cattle farmers within the US are being mirrored in Denmark, the place insurance policies have gotten more and more stringent. For instance, there was a current improve in the price of a federal veterinary inspector that have to be current on the location of a cattle being shot; a primary instance of what Hazlitt recognized as a “make-work” follow. In idiosyncratic bureaucratic irony, to assist farmers burdened by the governmentally elevated charges, farmers can now apply for governmental subsidies. It turns into clear why cattle manufacturing is considerably down, with the present 1.4 million cattle trying puny compared to the three.3 million cattle current in Denmark in 1965. The impact of those insurance policies is that the market is distorted to favor different types of dietary choices. For instance, Northern Europe’s largest insect farm has lately been inaugurated in Denmark. Hazlitt’s one lesson is consistent with Rothbard’s work and reveals us how market distortions occur with any financial intervention from the federal government. What could seem to be free-market forces at play, such because the talked about insect manufacturing unit being led by a non-public enterprise (Enorm), have been meaningfully impacted by the antecedent authorities insurance policies.
It may be stated that Denmark is exhibiting what Hoppe described because the inevitable results of the socialization of a social well being care system, whereby “a monstrous machinery of wealth and income redistribution at the expense of responsible individuals and low-risk groups in favor of irresponsible actors and high-risk groups has been put in motion.” Mises additionally recognized the perverse incentives current in state-funded healthcare, writing that it “makes a people sick bodily and mentally or at least helps to multiply, lengthen, and intensify disease.” These perverse incentives tie into the damaged window fallacy; all of the elevated spending for the decreased well being of the general public could be considered by up to date mainstream economists as useful for the economic system. With our deteriorating well being representing the damaged window, pro-GNP economists could rejoice the elevated well being spending. If Rothbard’s PPR have been adopted instead of GNP, the hurt of presidency spending would grow to be extra seen to everybody. Relating to well being care spending, options that deal with root causes of ailments effectively, as a substitute of chronically managing signs, could abruptly acquire extra traction. It’s because governments could be pressured to rethink their well being expenditure. Giving the federal government the advantage of the doubt relating to the morality of their intentions, it stays indeniable that loads of hurt could be accomplished by governmental interventions’ ripple results. Any coverage or guideline that stems from such a centralized type of energy (whether or not its goal inhabitants is Denmark’s 5.9 million or the US’s 345 million) is sure to have critical unintended penalties. The extra wise resolution is thus no more and higher authorities intervention, which makes an attempt to “recalibrate” any preliminary “over adjustments,” however much less authorities intervention.
Conclusion
This essay has explored how Hazlitt’s one lesson applies to numerous up to date points. The present case of Danish welfarism has been delved into by exploring each the seens and the unseens.
On a private word, I acknowledge the problem of totally internalizing Hazlitt’s lesson. As somebody at the moment benefiting from beneficiant instructional grants that help my snug life-style, it feels hypocritical and paradoxical to critique them by invoking the unseen prices. But, this query stays important. With out the flexibility to watch counterfactuals and misplaced potentials, we will solely theorize their impression—exactly Hazlitt’s level.
At its coronary heart, Hazlitt’s lesson underscores the inherent immorality of presidency intervention. Laying the foundations for contemporary libertarian idea, Franz Oppenheimer has defined how all authorities actions represent political means and are thus coercive (versus voluntary financial means). Thus, even seemingly useful outcomes of presidency intervention have to be condemned on precept. Hazlitt teaches us that past being morally unjustified, authorities interventions usually yield outcomes reverse to their intentions. This brings us, but once more, to query governmental motives; are the inducement misalignments of recent political and financial programs intentional or unintentional? Adopting a extra forgiving perspective, this Hayek quote involves thoughts: “Is there a greater tragedy imaginable than that, in our endeavor consciously to shape our future in accordance with high ideals, we should in fact unwittingly produce the very opposite of what we have been striving for?” Alternatively, a extra unforgiving outlook could lead the reader to the temptation of conveniently simplistic conclusions of grand conspiracies; nevertheless, the next George Carlin quote appears apt most often of societal degeneracy that appear to be brought on by evil cabals: “You don’t need a formal conspiracy when interests converge.”
References
The title of this essay evokes a well-known Shakespearean line from hamlet: No Sweat Shakespeare. “‘Something Is Rotten in the State Of Denmark’, Meaning.” Accessible from https://nosweatshakespeare.com/quotes/well-known/something- rotten-state-denmark/ (Final accessed: 22/01/2025).
Asmussen, Birgitte Skovlund (2023). “Camilla bruger det sjette SU-a r, som regeringen vil fjerne: ‘Vi er jo bare mennesker’.” DR. Accessible kind; https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/camilla-bruger-det-sjette-su-aar-som-regeringen- vil-fjerne-vi-er-jo-bare-mennesker (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
ATP. “Udbetaling Danmark.” Accessible from: https://www.atp.dk/vores- opgaver/administration-af-velfaerdsydelser/udbetaling-danmark (Final accessed: 19/01/2025).
Bastiat, Fre de ric [1850]. Ce qu’on voit et ce qu’on ne voit pas. Accessible from: https://www.institutcoppet.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/BASTIAT- Ce quon voit.pdf (Final Accessed: 23/01/2025).
Brown, Valerie (2024). “Can responsible grazing make beef climate-neutral?”, One Earth. Accessible from: https://www.oneearth.org/can-responsible-grazing-make-beef-climate- impartial/ (Final accessed: 15/01/2025).
Carlson, Allan ([1991] 2003). “What Has Government Done to Our Families?.” Mises Institute. Accessible from: https://mises.org/mises-daily/what-has-government-done-our- households (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Christenen, Maj Nygaard, Birgitte Thylstrup, and Esben Houborg. “New study on young people’s use of non-prescribed opioids in Denmark”, PopNAD. Accessible from: https://nordicwelfare.org/popnad/en/artiklar/new-study-on-young-peoples-use-of-non- prescribed-opioids-in-denmark/ (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Clark, Elijah (2023). “Unveiling The Dark Side Of Artificial Intelligence In The Job Market”, Forbes. Accessible from: https://www.forbes.com/websites/elijahclark/2023/08/18/unveiling-the-dark-side-of- artificial-intelligence-in-the-job-market/ (Final accessed: 19/01/2025).
Corporations by Market Cap (2025). “Largest companies in the EU by market capitalization.” Accessible from: https://companiesmarketcap.com/european-union/largest-companies-in- the-eu-by-market-cap/ (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
CPH Submit (2013). “More SU cheaters getting caught.” The Copenhagen Submit. Accessible from: https://cphpost.dk/2013-03-04/common/more-su-cheaters-getting-caught (Final accessed: 19/01/2025).
Danish Dementia Analysis Centre. “Dementia in Denmark.” Accessible from: https://videnscenterfordemens.dk/en/dementia-denmark (Final accessed: 17/01/2025).
Danish Well being Authority. “Vaccination.” Accessible from: https://www.sst.dk/en/english/Common-public/Vaccination (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Danmarks Statistik (1969). “Agricultural Statistics 1900-1965.” Satistiske Undersøgelser. Accessible from: https://www.dst.dk/Web site/Dst/Udgivelser/GetPubFile.aspx?id=19920&sid=landbbd2 (Final accessed: 19/01/2025).
Danmarks Statistik, “Fortsat lille fald i antallet af kvæg.” Accessible from: https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/nyheder-analyser- publ/nyt/NytHtml?cid=36125#:~:textual content=KvpercentC3percentA6gbestandenpercent2030.,varpercent20malkekpercentC 3percentB8erpercent2Cpercent207percent20pct (Final accessed: 19/01/2025).
Dennet, Daniel Clement (2023). “The Problem With Counterfeit People.” The Atlantic. Accessible from: https://www.theatlantic.com/expertise/archive/2023/05/problem- counterfeit-people/674075/ (Final accessed: 15/01/2025).
Ede, Georgia (2024). Change Your Weight-reduction plan, Change Your Thoughts: A Highly effective Plan to Enhance Temper, Overcome Nervousness, and Shield Reminiscence for a Lifetime of Optimum Psychological Well being. Hachette Ebook Group.
Feed and Additive (2023). “Northern Europe’s largest insect farm opens in Denmark.” Accessible from: https://www.feedandadditive.com/northern-europes-largest-insect-farm- opens-in-denmark/ (Final accessed: 19/01/2025).
Fellman, Susanna (2023). “Nordic social democracy in US politics.” Aarhus College. Accessible from: https://nordics.information/themes/nordic-social-democracy-in-us-politics (Final accessed: 16/01/2025).
Gavali, Pranav (2024). “The World’s 50 Largest Pharmaceutical Companies.” Visible Capitalist. Accessible from: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/worlds-50-largest- pharmaceutical-companies/ (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Goldman, David (2024). “Trump ups the ante on tariffs, vowing massive taxes on goods from Mexico, Canada and China on Day 1.” CNN. Accessible from: https://version.cnn.com/2024/11/25/politics/trump-tariffs-mexico-canada- china/index.html (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Gordon, David (2017). “Jeffrey Sachs’s Blind Spot.” Mises Institute. Accessible from: https://mises.org/mises-wire/jeffrey-sachss-blind-spot (Final accessed: 13/01/2025).
Hansen, Per Henrik (2002). “Denmark: Potemkin Village.” Mises Institute. Accessible from: https://mises.org/mises-daily/denmark-potemkin-village (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Hansen, Per Henrik (2003). “Denmark: A Case Study in Social Democracy.” Mises Institute. Accessible from: https://mises.org/mises-daily/denmark-case-study-social-democracy (Final accessed: 15/01/2025).
Hayek, Friedrich ([1944] 2005). The Street to Serfdom. The Institute of Financial Affairs.
Hazlitt, Henry (1946). Economics in One Lesson: The Shortest & Surest Solution to Perceive Primary Economics. Harper & Brothers.
Heinlein, Robert Anson (1966). The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress. G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Life in Denmark. “Calculate your housing benefit.” Accessible from: https://lifeindenmark.borger.dk/ActionPage?selfserviceId=5d2c31ed-d573-4513-a4dd- 3c4197ae8745 (Final accessed: 19/01/2025).
Life in Denmark. “Social assistance.” Accessible from: https://lifeindenmark.borger.dk/money-and-tax/social-benefits/social-assistance (Final accessed: 15/01/2025).
Lysiak, Matthew (2023). Fiat Meals. The Saif Home.
McMaken, Ryan (2015). “Life Expectancy: If Denmark Were a US State, It Would Rank Equal To or Worse Than Sixteen US States.” Mises Institute. Accessible from: https://mises.org/mises-wire/life-expectancy-if-denmark-were-us-state-it-would-rank- equal-or-worse-sixteen-us-states (Final accessed: 14/01/2025).
McMaken, Ryan (2022). Breaking Away: The Case for Secession, Radical Decentralization, and Smaller Polities. Mises Institute.
Ministry of Meals, Agriculture and Fisheries of Denmark (2023). “Danish Action Plan for Plant-based Foods.” Accessible from: https://en.fvm.dk/Media/638484294982868221/Danish-Motion-Plan-for-Plant-based- Meals.pdf (Final accessed: 15/01/2025).
Ministry of Overseas Affairs of Denmark, “About Denmark.” Accessible from: https://indien.um.dk/en/denmark-in-india/about-denmark (Final accessed: 13/01/2025).
Ministry of Overseas Affairs of Denmark. “Danish support for Ukraine.” Accessible from: https://um.dk/en/foreign-policy/danish-support-for-ukraine (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Mises, Ludwig von ([1922] 1981). Socialism: An Financial and Sociological Evaluation. Yale College Press.
Mises, Ludwig von ([1950] 2006). “Middle-of-the-Road Policy Leads to Socialism.” Mises Institute. Accessible from: https://mises.org/mises-daily/middle-road-policy-leads- socialism (Final accessed: 14/01/2025).
Mises, Ludwig von ([1951] 2004). The Free Market and Its Enemies: Pseudo-Science, Socialism, and Inflation. Basis For Financial Schooling.
Mises, Ludwig von (1944). Paperwork. Yale College Press.
Mises, Ludwig von [1942]. “Social Science and Natural Science.” Journal of Social Philosophy and Jurisprudence 7, no. 3.
Mogensen, Peter (2024). “Landmand med 600 dyr: Vi får sværere ved at vinde over argentinske bøffer med nye gebyrer.” Landbrugsavisen. Accessible from: https://landbrugsavisen.dk/kvpercentC3percentA6g/landmand-med-600-dyr-vi-fpercentC3percentA5r- svpercentC3percentA6rere-ved-vinde-over-argentinske-bpercentC3percentB8ffer-med-nye-gebyrer (Final accessed: 19/01/2025).
NoCowEyes (2013). “Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher (2001-05-16).” [quote at minute 5:00] Accessible from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKq1305i69c&ab channel=NoCowEyes (Final accessed: 22/01/2025).
OECD. “Denmark.” Higher Life Index. Accessible from: https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/international locations/denmark/ (Final accessed: 19/01/2025).
Pedersen, Lasse Ege (2024). “Ny ordning skal afhjælpe mod stigende gebyrer: Det er en uelegant lappeløsning.” Landbrugs Avisen. Accessible from: https://landbrugsavisen.dk/ny- ordning-skal-afhjaelpe-mod-stigende-gebyrer-det-er-en-uelegant- lappelosning#:~:textual content=Nypercent20ordningpercent20skalpercent20afhjpercentC3percentA6lpepercent20modpercent20stigende %20gebyrerpercent3Apercent20Detpercent20erpercent20enpercent20uelegantpercent20lappelpercentC3percentB8sning&textual content=Den %20nyepercent20stpercentC3percentB8tteordningpercent20derpercent20skal,forpercent20avlsforeningpercent20afpercent20skotsk %20hpercentC3percentB8jlandskvpercentC3percentA6g (Final accessed: 19/01/2025).
Pettinger, Tevjan (2024). “Why Denmark is rich despite high taxes?.” Economics Assist. Accessible from: https://www.economicshelp.org/weblog/216130/economics/why- denmark-is-rich-despite-high- taxes/#:~:textual content=Accordingpercent20topercent20apercent20Galluppercent20poll,healthpercent20orpercent20highpercent20train %20fares (Final accessed: 19/01/2025).
Ritzau (2023. “Almost one in ten in Denmark prescribed antidepressants.” The Native. Accessible from: https://www.thelocal.dk/20230228/almost-one-in-ten-in-denmark- prescribed-antidepressants (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Rolander, Niclas (2024). “Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy and Ozempic boom saved Denmark’s GDP from a no-growth 2023—and will help double its expected growth this year, country’s largest bank says.” Bloomberg. Accessible from: https://fortune.com/europe/2024/03/05/novo-nordisks-wegovy-and-ozempic-boom- saved-denmarks-gdp-from-a-no-growth-2023/ (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Rothbard, Murray Newton ([1962] 2004). Man, Economic system, and State with Energy and Market. Mises Institute.
Rothbard, Murray Newton ([1974] 2000). Egalitarianism as a Revolt Towards Nature and Different Essays. Mises Institute.
Rothbard, Murray Newton ([1976] 2011). “Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics.” From Financial Controversies, Mises Institute.
Salatin, Joel (2007). Every part I Need To Do Is Unlawful. Polyface Integrated.
Sandbu, Martin (2018). “What the Nordic mixed economy can teach today’s new left.” Monetary Instances. Accessible from: https://www.ft.com/content material/6297bf96-aa16-11e8- 94bd-cba20d67390c (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Sanders, Bernie (2013). “What Can We Learn From Denmark?” Huffpost. Accessible from: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/what-can-we-learn-from-de b 3339736 (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Schumpeter, Joseph (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper Collins.
Statista. 2024. “Global pharmaceutical industry – statistics & facts.” Accessible from: https://www.statista.com/matters/1764/global-pharmaceutical-industry/#topicOverview (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Statistics Denmark. “Economy of the general government sector.” Accessible from: https://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/emner/oekonomi/offentlig-oekonomi/offentlig- sektors-oekonomi (Final accessed: 17/01/2025).
Tao, Aaron (2015). “Your Government-Approved Diet May Kill You”, Mises Institute. Accessible from: https://mises.org/mises-daily/your-government-approved-diet-may-kill- you (Final accessed: 15/01/2025).
Taubes, Gary (2007). Good Energy, Dangerous Energy: Fat, Carbs, and the Controversial Science of Weight-reduction plan and Well being. Alfred A. Knopf.
Teicholz, Nina (2014). The Massive Fats Shock: why butter meat, and cheese belong in a nutritious diet. Scribe Publications.
The Native Denmark (2018). “Number of young Danes diagnosed with anxiety and depression trebles in ten years.” The Native. Accessible from: https://www.thelocal.dk/20180206/number-of-young-danes-diagnosed-with-angst-and- depression-trebles-in-ten-years (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Tolstrup, Janne, Maja Bramming, Michael Davidsen, and Stine Schramm (2023). “Time trends in body mass index distribution in the general population in Denmark from 1987 to 2021.” Accessible from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37897390/ (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Torrella, Kenny (2024). “Denmark is tiny. Its ambition to make its food system more climate-friendly is huge.” Vox. Accessible from: https://www.vox.com/future- excellent/384515/rune-christoffer-dragsdahl-vegetarian-society-denmark-animal-welfare- future-perfect-50 (Final accessed: 15/01/2025).
Trustpilot. “SU.” Accessible from: https://dk.trustpilot.com/evaluation/www.su.dk (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
Uddanelses og Forskningstyrelsen. “SU.” Accessible from: https://su.dk/ (Final accessed: 19/01/2025).
USDA (2020). “Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025.” Accessible from: https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/websites/default/information/2020- 12/Dietary Pointers for Individuals 2020-2025.pdf (Final accessed: 18/01/2025).
