LOS ANGELES — The Trump administration final week ramped up its efforts to erode nationwide local weather progress with a sweeping govt order aimed toward undermining states’ potential to set their very own environmental insurance policies.
In an order dated April 8, the president directed Legal professional Basic Pam Bondi to establish and “stop the enforcement of” state legal guidelines that handle local weather change and different environmental initiatives.
“Many States have enacted, or are in the process of enacting, burdensome and ideologically motivated ‘climate change’ or energy policies that threaten American energy dominance and our economic and national security,” President Donald Trump wrote within the govt order.
“These State laws and policies are fundamentally irreconcilable with my Administration’s objective to unleash American energy,” he wrote. “They should not stand.”
The assertion of federal energy over states’ rights appears to go in opposition to a few of Trump’s different positions — he campaigned, for instance, on state’s rights for points reminiscent of abortion. The order calls out a number of states particularly, together with New York and Vermont, which he accuses of “extorting” fossil-fuel corporations for his or her previous contributions to planet-warming greenhouse fuel emissions.
The order additionally takes intention at key parts of California’s combat in opposition to local weather change. The state’s cap-and-trade program is a first-of-its-kind initiative that units limits on corporations’ greenhouse fuel emissions and permits them to promote “credits” for unused emissions to different corporations.
“California, for example, punishes carbon use by adopting impossible caps on the amount of carbon businesses may use, all but forcing businesses to pay large sums to ‘trade’ carbon credits to meet California’s radical requirements,” the president wrote.
The manager order marks a continuation of Trump’s current anti-environmental efforts, which have included cuts to grant funding, widespread workplace closures and layoffs within the local weather analysis group, loosened rules and renewed efforts to develop the manufacturing of oil and coal — two sectors that contribute closely to international warming.
It additionally marks an escalation of Trump’s battle with California. The president in current months has taken specific intention on the Democratic stronghold, together with threatening to withhold catastrophe assist for the state’s wildfire response and restoration over points reminiscent of forest administration and water insurance policies.
“There’s a little bit of beef right now between Trump and the state,” stated Maggie Coulter, a senior legal professional with the Local weather Legislation Institute on the nonprofit Heart for Organic Range. “I think wanting to call out California was part of why cap-and-trade got mentioned.”
Cap-and-trade isn’t the one California program that might be within the federal authorities’s crosshairs. The order directs Bondi to hunt out and prioritize state legal guidelines that handle local weather change, environmental justice, greenhouse fuel emissions and carbon taxes, which is “kind of like a laundry list of all the things the oil-and-gas industry doesn’t like,” Coulter stated.
To that finish, the manager order may additionally have an effect on California’s potential to set strict tailpipe emission requirements and its effort to transition to electrical automobiles, together with a state legislation banning the sale of recent gas-powered automobiles in 2035.
The Trump administration has already made strikes to dam that legislation, which are actually enjoying out within the courts.
The manager order moreover might impression California’s Polluters Pay Local weather Superfund Act of 2025, a invoice at present working its approach via the state Legislature that will require fossil gas corporations to pay for harm attributable to their greenhouse fuel emissions. It’s just like the laws in New York and Vermont that Trump known as out in his order, Coulter stated.
Blocking these legal guidelines could be akin to creating immunity for the fossil-fuel business from these damages, not in contrast to protections that defend firearms producers from sure civil lawsuits, in line with Cassidy DiPaola, communications director with Make Polluters Pay, a marketing campaign for local weather accountability.
“President Trump’s executive order weaponizes the Justice Department against states like California that want to make polluters pay for climate damage,” DiPaola wrote in a press release. “This is the fossil-fuel industry’s desperation on full display — they’re so afraid of facing evidence of their deception in court that they’ve convinced the President to launch a federal assault on state sovereignty.”
Certainly, the oil-and-gas business celebrated the order — issued the identical week the president additionally ordered the quick growth of coal manufacturing within the nation, together with opening federal lands to coal leasing and lengthening the working lifetime of present coal crops.
“We welcome President Trump’s action to hold states like New York and California accountable for pursuing unconstitutional efforts that illegally penalize U.S. oil and natural gas producers for delivering the energy American consumers rely on every day,” learn a press release from Ryan Meyers, senior vice chairman with the American Petroleum Institute.
The Trump administration has acknowledged that its slew of environmental rollbacks is meant to ease regulatory prices, decrease taxes and develop the creation of an “affordable and reliable domestic energy supply.”
The order provides Bondi 60 days to compile a listing of relevant state local weather legal guidelines and submit a report back to the president relating to actions taken, together with suggestions for added legislative steps essential to cease the enforcement of these state legal guidelines.
Coulter, of the Local weather Legislation Institute, stated really stopping states from implementing their legal guidelines could be an unlawful and unconstitutional overreach.
“It’s not really something that Trump or the attorney general can do,” Coulter stated. “If you want to stop the enforcement of state law, you have to go to court.”
