This previous January 6, a joint session of Congress licensed the election of Donald Trump as president. The occasion was ceremonial, as all people knew proper after the November election that Trump had defeated Kamala Harris, whose efforts to fill in for lifeless “President” Joe Biden, had been a depressing failure, in an amazing victory. It was ironic that Harris, presiding over the session, needed to learn the tally of her personal defeat. January 6, 2021 was in no way like that. There was credible proof that the election of 2020 had been stolen from Trump, and he and his supporters weren’t about to go quietly.
Let’s first take a look at the proof the election was stolen. In keeping with Paul Craig Roberts: “The official narrative that there was no election theft is likely the largest lie ever perpetrated on the world. The lie is so vast and so fragile that everyone who disagrees with the official narrative is suppressed, deplatformed, kicked off social media, ostracized, and fired from their job in order to protect the lie from examination and exposure. In Michigan the state attorney general is attempting to debar attorneys who represented cases of electoral theft. Massive effort was made—including an orchestrated “storming of the Capitol”—to insure that the proof wouldn’t be offered and that almost all of the inhabitants would by no means encounter the proof. The presstitutes from the primary occasion declared constantly with one voice ‘there was no vote fraud,’ ‘baseless claims of vote fraud,’ and the outdated standby ‘conspiracy theory.’
Clearly, if there was no fraud, there would have been no hazard in analyzing ‘baseless claims.’ Their baselessness might merely have been demonstrated. If the claims of electoral fraud are baseless, there was no must spilt the nation and to trigger half of the voting inhabitants to mistrust the general public establishments which might be alleged to uphold election integrity Even with out laborious proof of a stolen election, it’s apparent that Trump didn’t lose to Biden who impressed no enthusiasm and whose marketing campaign occasions needed to be halted attributable to non-attendance. How did Trump lose the election when on December 29, after two months of his heightened demonization following the November 2020 election, he gained the annual Gallup survey as America’s most admired particular person, ending Obama’s 12-year run. In keeping with the official vote rely, Trump acquired 11 million extra votes in 2020 than the quantity he gained in 2016 and 3 times the black help. In 2020 Trump acquired 8 million extra votes than Obama acquired in 2012 and Hillary acquired in 2016. It isn’t attainable that this extraordinary efficiency is a dropping one. And that is his official vote rely, not his suppressed precise vote.
No sane particular person believes that such an uninspiring candidate as Biden garnered 81.2 million votes—15.3 million extra standard votes than Obama in 2012 and Hillary in 2016. The Obama-Hillary standard vote of 65 to 66 million is the restrict of the Democrat vote. Even Trump’s dropping official vote rely of 74 million is bigger than any successful president in American historical past apart from the fraudulent 2020 Biden vote rely.
In different phrases, no voting machine or different materials proof is required to see that the 2020 election was stolen.
However, there may be large proof. Giuliani collected lots of it, and it was offered to members of state legislatures in swing states. I watched displays of the proof by extremely expert analysts and sworn witnesses. In earlier postings on this web site there are hyperlinks to the displays. As a lot info has been deplatformed, the hyperlinks would possibly now not work. However ‘MyPillow’ CEO Mike Lindell has collected a number of the specialists who investigated the electoral fraud and has put collectively a two-hour video that gives a number of the large proof, actually sufficient to liberate you from the media indoctrination ‘there is no evidence.’”
Trump and his supporters had each proper to problem the election. This consists of the proper to reveal in opposition to the counting of the ballots in Congress. Though the counting is generally a formality, it doesn’t must be, and members of Congress have the proper to problem the seating of electors.
With that in thoughts, Trump spoke to a rally in Washington. He urged his supporters to reveal in opposition to the counting and deliberate to affix them, however he was turned away from doing so. He urged the demonstrators to be peaceable, and aside from a number of agent provocateurs, they have been. They didn’t break into the Capitol however have been let in by the police. Certainly, the primary violence that day was the homicide of a peaceable protestor, Ashli Babbitt. A policeman shot her within the again. As Jacob Hornberger stories, “The Washington, D.C., establishment is, needless to say, up in arms over President-elect Trump’s plans to pardon the protestors who stormed the Capitol on January 6 four years ago. After hundreds of criminal prosecutions and sometimes long jail sentences meted out by federal judges, Trump’s pardons will be upending not only the entire prosecution-and-conviction scheme but also the ludicrous official narrative that has been used to justify the prosecutions and sentences. The narrative states that the protestors were intent on violently overthrowing the federal government and installing Trump into power — overcoming the opposition, of course, of the Pentagon, the CIA, the NSA, the Capitol police, the D.C. police, and the FBI.
It would be difficult to find a more ludicrous narrative than that. It’s worth mentioning that not one of the protestors had AR-15s or other assault rifles or high-powered handguns. Just think — this would have been the first violent overthrow of a government in history without one ‘insurrectionist’ wielding a gun.
Not so, however, with the Capitol police. They were fully armed, as one of the unarmed protestors, a woman named Ashli Babbitt, discovered. As Babbitt was attempting to get through a broken glass window inside the Capitol, Capitol policeman Michael Byrd shot her dead with his gun instead of simply arresting her and taking her into custody.
Mind you, Babbitt was not threatening Byrd with any force, much less deadly force. She was just trying to get through the window. The problem is that Byrd got scared, and his fear caused him to shoot and kill an unarmed protestor. Under the law, fear is not a justification for the unauthorized use of deadly force.
Grow or Die: The Good …The Good, DavidBest Price: $13.29Buy New $13.99(as of 01:26 UTC – Details)
Not surprisingly, however, the U.S. Department of Justice let Byrd off the hook. They said that he was justified in shooting and killing Babbitt.
Well, let’s change the situation around. Let’s assume that Byrd was an unarmed Capitol guard. Let’s also assume that Babbitt trespassed into the Capitol with an AR-15. Let’s say that Babbitt encountered the uninformed Byrd, got scared, and shot and killed him.
What would have been the reaction of the Justice Department to that sequence of events? We all know the reaction. It would have been totally opposite to how they treated Byrd’s killing of Babbitt. They would have arrested Babbitt, quickly had her indicted and convicted of murder or some lesser included offense, such as manslaughter or at least negligent homicide. Some federal judge would have thrown the book at her, meting out the highest possible prison sentence.
Not so though with Michael Byrd. He gets to go scot-free despite the fact that he employed deadly force against an unarmed woman who was not threatening him with any force whatsoever, much less deadly force.
Michael Byrd doesn’t deserve a pardon for his disgraceful killing of an unarmed protestor, and we can only hope that President Biden doesn’t give him one before he leaves office. Byrd deserves a criminal indictment, which Trump’s Justice Department should secure for him. Reprinted with permission from The Future of Freedom Foundation.”
Regardless of this, a lot of protestors have been charged with crimes, together with rebellion, and given draconian jail sentences. The protestors have been clearly not engaged in an rebellion, which is an try and overthrow the federal government. They weren’t making an attempt to overthrow the federal government; they have been making an attempt to forestall the election from being subverted.
Some radical leftists went as far as to assert that Trump was responsible of rebellion and must be barred from operating for president due to a legislation handed by the Radical Republicans within the 1860s, which was aimed toward stopping supporters of the Confederacy from holding federal workplace. The Supreme Courtroom of Colorado purchased this transparently false argument in a cut up 4 to three resolution, and dominated that Trump must be faraway from the poll in Colorado, however the Supreme Courtroom unanimously overruled dominated this.
Trump was not responsible of an rebellion. We should always do the whole lot we are able to to oppose the false declare that he was. Trump has promised to pardon the protestors, as he ought to, and Michael Byrd must be prosecuted. We should defeat the efforts of the novel left to subvert the electoral course of.