It has occurred earlier than: an upset victory by a Democratic Socialist in an essential major election after a unprecedented grassroots marketing campaign.
In the summertime of 1934, Upton Sinclair earned the sort of headlines that greeted Zohran Mamdani’s major victory on June 24, 2025, within the New York Metropolis mayoral election.
Mamdani’s win stunned almost everybody. Not simply because he beat the closely favored former governor Andrew Cuomo, however as a result of he did so by a big margin. As a result of he did so with a singular coalition, and since his Muslim identification and membership within the Democratic Socialists of America ought to have, in typical political considering, made victory not possible.
This sounds acquainted, a minimum of to historians like me. Upton Sinclair, the well-known creator and a socialist for many of his life, ran for governor in California in 1934 and received the Democratic major election with a radical plan that he referred to as Finish Poverty in California, or EPIC.
What occurred subsequent could concern Mamdani supporters. Enterprise and media elites mounted a marketing campaign of concern that put Sinclair on the defensive. In the meantime, conservative Democrats defected, and a 3rd candidate break up progressive votes.
Within the November election, Sinclair misplaced decisively to incumbent Gov. Frank Merriam, who would have stood much less probability in opposition to a standard Democrat.
As a historian of American radicalism, I’ve written extensively about Sinclair’s EPIC motion, and I direct an internet mission that features detailed accounts of the marketing campaign and copies of marketing campaign supplies.
Upton’s 1934 marketing campaign initiated the on-again, off-again affect of radicals within the Democratic Celebration and illustrates a number of the potential dynamics of that relationship, which, virtually 100 years later, could also be related to Mamdani within the coming months.
Upton Sinclair is seen in September 1934 in Poughkeepsie, N.Y., following a convention with President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Bettmann/Contributor/Getty Photos
California, 1934
Sinclair launched his gubernatorial marketing campaign in late 1933, hoping to make a distinction however not anticipating to win. California remained mired within the Nice Melancholy. The unemployment fee had been estimated at 29% when Roosevelt took workplace in March and had improved solely barely since then.
Sinclair’s Socialist Celebration had failed badly within the 1932 presidential election as Democrat Roosevelt swept to victory. These poor outcomes included California, the place the Democratic Celebration had been an afterthought for greater than three many years.
Sinclair determined that it was time to see what could possibly be completed by radicals working inside that occasion.
Reregistering as a Democrat, he dashed off a 64-page pamphlet with the futuristic title I, Governor of California and How I Ended Poverty. It detailed his plan to resolve California’s huge unemployment disaster by having the state take over idle farms and factories and switch them into cooperatives devoted to “production for use” as an alternative of “production for profit.”
Sinclair speaks to a bunch in his marketing campaign headquarters in Los Angeles, Calif., in September 1934.
Bettmann/ Contributor/Getty Photos
Mainstream Democrats waited too lengthy to fret about Sinclair after which didn’t unite behind another candidate. However it could not have mattered. Sinclair celebrated a large major victory, gaining extra votes than all of his opponents mixed.
“What is the matter with California?” The Boston Globe requested, based on creator Greg Mitchell. “That is the farthest shift to the left ever made by voters of a major party in this country.”
Constructing concern
Primaries are one factor. However in 1934, the November normal election turned in a unique path.
Terrified by Sinclair’s plan, enterprise leaders mobilized to defeat EPIC, forming the sort of cross-party coalition that’s uncommon in America besides when radicals pose an electoral risk. Sinclair described the trouble in a guide he wrote shortly after the November election: “I, Candidate for Governor: And How I Got Licked.”
Few individuals of any occasion had been keen about Merriam, who had lately angered many Californians by sending the Nationwide Guard to interrupt a Longshore strike in San Francisco, solely to set off a normal strike that shut down town.
A billboard helps Republican Frank Merriam and opposes Democrat Upton Sinclair for governor of California in January 1934.
Bettmann /Contributor/Getty Photos
EPIC confronted one other problem, candidate Raymond Haight, operating on the Progressive Celebration label. Haight threatened to divide left-leaning voters.
Sinclair tried to defend himself, energetically denouncing what he referred to as the “Lie Factory” and providing revised, extra average variations of some parts of the EPIC plan. However the Crimson Scare marketing campaign labored. Merriam simply outdistanced Sinclair, profitable by a plurality within the three-way race.
New York, 2025
Will a Democratic Socialist operating for mayor in New York face something comparable within the months forward?
A motion to cease Mamdani is coming collectively, and a few of what they’re saying resonates with the 1934 marketing campaign to cease Sinclair.
And there could also be one thing comparable in regards to the political dynamics.
Sinclair’s opponents might provide solely a weak various candidate. Merriam had few associates and lots of critics.
In 2025, New York Metropolis Mayor Eric Adams, who deserted the first when he was operating as a Democrat and is now operating as an impartial, is arguably weaker nonetheless, having been rescued by President Donald Trump from a corruption indictment which may have despatched him to jail. If he’s the very best hope to cease Mamdani, the marketing campaign technique will possible parallel 1934. All assault advertisements – little effort to advertise Adams.
However there is a vital distinction in the way in which the New York contest is organising. Andrew Cuomo stays on the poll as an impartial, and his identify might draw votes which may in any other case go to Adams.
Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, can even be on the poll. Whereas in 1934 two candidates divided progressive votes, in 2025 three candidates are going to divide the stop-Mamdani votes.
Faith additionally looms massive within the marketing campaign forward. The New York Metropolis metro space’s U.S. Muslim inhabitants is claimed to be a minimum of 600,000, in comparison with an estimated 1.6 million Jewish residents. Adams has introduced that the specter of antisemitism would be the main theme of his marketing campaign.
The stop-Sinclair marketing campaign additionally relied on faith, specializing in his professed atheism and pulling quotations from books he had written denouncing organized faith. Nonetheless, a statistical evaluation of voting demographics means that this effort proved unimportant.
